The Truth About the Health Care Bill
by Michael Connelly
I have read the entire text of proposed House Bill 3200: The Affordable
Health Care Choices Act of 2009. I studied it with particular emphasis
from my area of expertise, constitutional law. I was frankly
concerned that parts of the proposed law that were being discussed
might be unconstitutional. What I found was far worse than what I had
heard or expected.
To begin with, much of what has been said about the law and its
implications is in fact true, despite what the Democrats and the media
are saying. The law does provide for rationing of health care,
particularly where senior citizens and other classes of citizens are
involved, free health care for illegal immigrants, free abortion
services, and probably forced participation in abortions by members of
the medical profession.
The Bill will also eventually force private insurance companies out of
business, and put everyone into a government run system. All
decisions about personal health care will ultimately be made by federal
bureaucrats, and most of them will not be health care
professionals. Hospital admissions, payments to physicians, and
allocations of necessary medical devices will be strictly controlled by
the government.
However, as scary as all of that is, it just scratches the
surface. In fact, I have concluded that this legislation really
has no intention of providing affordable health care choices.
Instead it is a convenient cover for the most massive transfer of power
to the Executive Branch of government that has ever occurred, or even
been contemplated If this law or a similar one is adopted, major
portions of the Constitution of the United States will effectively have
been destroyed.
The first thing to go will be the masterfully crafted balance of power
between the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the U.S.
Government. The Congress will be transferring to the Obama
Administration authority in a number of different areas over the lives
of the American people, and the businesses they own.
The irony is that the Congress doesn't have any authority to legislate
in most of those areas to begin with! I defy anyone to read the
text of the U.S. Constitution and find any authority granted to the
members of Congress to regulate health care.
This legislation also provides for access, by the appointees of the
Obama administration, of all of your personal healthcare direct
violation of the specific provisions of the 4th Amendment to the
Constitution information, your personal financial information, and the
information of your employer, physician, and hospital. All of
this is a protecting against unreasonable searches and seizures.
You can also forget about the right to privacy. That will have
been legislated into oblivion regardless of what the 3rd and 4th
Amendments may provide.
If you decide not to have healthcare insurance, or if you have private
insurance that is not deemed acceptable to the Health Choices
Administrator appointed by Obama, there will be a tax imposed on
you. It is called a tax instead of a fine because of the intent
to avoid application of the due process clause of the 5th Amendment.
However, that doesn't work because since there is nothing in the law
that allows you to contest or appeal the imposition of the tax, it is
definitely depriving someone of property without the due process of
law.
So, there are three of those pesky amendments that the far left hate so
much, out of the original ten in the Bill of Rights, that are
effectively nullified by this law It doesn't stop there though.
The 9th Amendment that provides: The enumeration in the Constitution,
of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others
retained by the people;
The 10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United
States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are
preserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Under the
provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people
nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many
areas that once were theirs to control.
I could write many more pages about this legislation, but I think you
get the idea. This is not about health care; it is about seizing
power and limiting rights. Article 6 of the Constitution requires
the members of both houses of Congress to "be bound by oath or
affirmation to support the Constitution." If I were a member of
Congress I would not be able to vote for this legislation or anything
like it, without feeling I was violating that sacred oath or
affirmation. If I voted for it anyway, I would hope the American
people would hold me accountable.
For those who might doubt the nature of this threat, I suggest they
consult the source, the US Constitution, and Bill of Rights. There you
can see exactly what we are about to have taken from us.