One of the questions debated by Christians and atheists is whether children are born atheist or with the knowledge of God. The atheists have a field day with this. "How could a baby know anything about God?" Then the question is asked whether we are born with an innate understanding of right and wrong? Some atheists immediately answer that even animals have some understanding of right and wrong, but they don't get very far arguing along those lines, because an animal operates on instinct, so morality isn't even an issue.
The atheists say that man is just another animal, that "we're essentially the same," but that man has achieved self-awareness and that Christians are "delusional" to think they are superior to animals. "So there's no difference between you and the ape?" might be a harsh question to ask at this point, but it often leads to the core issue with atheists, namely the theory of evolution, that man descended from the ape, and that the universe was created by the Big Bang, thus denying the Scriptures and God's creation of the universe.
Furthermore, atheists quote Karl Marx, that religion is the opium of the masses, that none of the Bible is true. Then, Christians counter atheism with the magnificence of God's Creation and His love for humanity, while atheists cling to Darwin's Theory of Evolution and the indifference of the Big Bang Theory. The debate goes nowhere.
The Theory of the Aborigine, however, addresses the issue of the human animal's evolution. Atheism is symptomatic of the aboriginal man's condition of having no awareness of a Creator, or it's his failure to feel an instinctual awareness of God. This lack of awareness in the Creator festers in the aborigine's soul until he seeks a solution for all the greed and brutality of the world on an animal level, using his knowledge of science and his egocentric vision of the world. Thus, atheists are men attempting to play God, relying on 19th and 20th Century ideas, full of the sense of their own importance as modern men of science, setting aside ten thousand years of history recorded in the Scriptures.
These Scriptures represent an authentic civilization, based on the discoveries of human beings over the course of thousands of years. This civilization is built on the true science that God intended for the human being to have, and it's the true knowledge of the human being that recognizes God as the Creator of the universe. The solution of the aboriginal man's animal brain, on the other hand, is to seek a social order that guarantees some semblance of civilization based on observable laws of nature. Democracy is the most successful of these systems of laws. It provides a logical evaluation of everyone's rights and responsibilities in a society. This works well until other societies wish to partake of the same social order and benefit from the prosperity of the others more fortunate than themselves, due to advantages of geography or circumstance. The final result is usually war and then a settlement is reached where the victor seizes the spoils of war and the loser must put up with even less than what he started out with, assuming he is still in possession of his life.
The aborigine gets nowhere until he realizes that the world didn't just happen, that nothing is created from nothing, that there's a Creator and that the human beings, who recognized God's existence and recorded the fact in their earliest written legends about 4000 BC, were indeed onto something. Modern science with its inflated sense of importance can't match the ten thousand years of civilization represented in the Scriptures.